top of page
Search

Critical Analysis on the Western Media’s Coverage of the Israel-Hamas Conflict

The Israeli-Hamas conflict, characterized by its intricate nature and rapid evolution, has garnered extensive attention within Western media. Significantly, there is a notable contrast in the way news outlets cover events like the Al-Aqsa Attack and the Jenin Incursion.


Just this year, we've witnessed a dramatic surge in Israeli attacks on Gaza and if the situation weren't dire enough, with the blockade, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and what some consider borderline genocide, it's become even more alarming Living conditions in Gaza have deteriorated, and the United Nations issued a statement warning that by 2020, unless the Israeli siege on Gaza was lifted, it would become uninhabitable.


Israel persists in targeting Gaza's journalists, aiming to suppress the truth about their inhumane massacres. At least six journalists have lost their lives, and two are currently missing. A professor at George Washington University, an expert in genocide studies, has noted, "Research on genocide over the past several decades has shed light on the preconditions, which serve as a reasonable starting point... Many states might qualify, but Israel aligns with all the criteria." This statement underscores the gravity of genocide and ethnic cleansing, and it's a call to action that we cannot ignore.


In 'Liberal democracies', we find the Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, taking measures to suppress pro-Arab chants, and positing the notion that waving the Palestinian flag may constitute a criminal transgression. Even Labours shadow minister, Azfal Khan, has found themselves compelled to issue an apology, simply for having their photograph taken in front of a Palestinian stand at the Labour Party conference. This raises a pertinent inquiry: Are individuals permitted to advocate for positions contrary to the prevailing status quo in the face of what appears to be an increasingly authoritarian administration? This issue goes beyond its immediate effects because it relates to the worries of the general public. It highlights how our basic rights to speak freely and protest are being threatened by powerful political figures who are trying to stop us from expressing our opinions.


It's evident that Western media is presenting only one side of the story, leaving much untold. It's our responsibility to raise our voices and advocate for those whose voices are currently being silenced.





Comments


bottom of page